![]() ![]() ![]() It’s just a gimmicky shorthand for her idea that women should behave very passively and constantly share their feelings with men (soft), and if anything happens that is abusive or inappropriate, the woman should leave his presence (strong). When the phrase is explained in the program, there really is no applicable “inside” or “outside” to it at all. What inside and outside are we talking about? Your skin? Your internal organs? Do you have an inside and outside of your mind? And inside and outside to your psychology? Is it really referring to being two-faced with the guy? Are you supposed to appear to be one way for the man (soft and weak?), but secretly, “on the inside” be something else (strong)? And how long is that strategy supposed to last exactly? Is this a game you play forever? Not inside, not outside, not in the middle… this verbal gimmick doesn’t even make sense. I am familiar with the phrase, since her programs were part of the many dozens I researched and studied in my initial training years ago, and now in the fullness of time, and having since put together the principles of what I would call “a true Siren”, let me explain why I believe this idea to be complete nonsense.įirst of all, you don’t have to be “soft” anywhere. Recently, I’ve had several women ask me about the Rori’s “soft on the outside, strong on the inside” line that she often uses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |